The British Colonial Paradox: Did They Really "Save" India's Marginalized Castes or Create a System of Perpetual Oppression?
The question of whether British colonial rule "saved" India's marginalized communities—particularly the Other Backward Classes (OBC), Scheduled Castes (SC), and Scheduled Tribes (ST)—represents one of the most contentious debates in Indian historical scholarship. While British administrators often portrayed themselves as liberators of India's oppressed castes, the historical evidence reveals a far more complex and troubling reality. The colonial administration simultaneously introduced legal frameworks that provided some protection while implementing discriminatory policies that institutionalized and rigidified existing social hierarchies in unprecedented ways.
1. The Great Colonial Deception: Understanding British Motivations
1.1 The Divide and Rule Strategy
The British colonial strategy was fundamentally rooted in maintaining control through division. Following the shocking experience of the 1857 revolt, when diverse Indian communities united against foreign rule, British officials became acutely aware that beneath India's apparent diversity lay a unifying consciousness that could threaten their dominance. As Charles Wood, Secretary of State for India, wrote to Viceroy Elgin: "How long would we be able to stand our ground were the whole of India to stand up in unison against us?"
This realization led to the systematic implementation of divide and rule policies, with caste becoming a central tool for maintaining British supremacy. Colonial officials conducted detailed surveys and classifications, with Sir Richard Temple proudly declaring upon his return to England: "For the first time in history, we (British) have measured every field in India, identified every human being, and marked every tree".
1.2 The Administrative Convenience of Caste Classification
The British approach to caste was primarily driven by administrative convenience rather than genuine concern for social justice. As one colonial administrator admitted, they "pigeon-holed everyone by castes and if we could not find a true caste for them labeled them with the name of a hereditary occupation... we are largely responsible for the [caste] system which we deplore". This systematic classification process transformed fluid and complex social identities into rigid, legally defined categories that would have lasting consequences for Indian society.
2. The Criminal Tribes Act 1871: The Dark Side of Colonial "Protection"
2.1 Legal Framework of Oppression
Perhaps the most damaging aspect of British colonial policy toward marginalized communities was the Criminal Tribes Act of 1871. This legislation branded entire communities as "hereditary criminals," affecting an estimated 13 million people across 127 communities by the time of Independence. The Act stated that if local government had "reason to believe that any tribe, gang, or class of persons is addicted to the systematic commission of non-bailable offenses," it could declare such groups as criminal tribes.
The Act's language was deliberately vague, requiring no evidence to prove addiction to crime and failing to define "addiction" objectively. This legal framework enabled local governments to declare entire communities criminal simply based on suspicion, creating a system where being born into certain castes or tribes made one a criminal by birth.
2.2 Impact on Marginalized Communities
- Systematic Surveillance: All adult male members of notified tribes were required to report weekly to local police.
- Forced Settlements: Special "reformatory" settlements were established where tribal families were forced to live, often separating children from their parents.
- Economic Restrictions: Affected communities faced severe restrictions on movement, employment, and social interaction.
- Hereditary Criminalization: The concept of "born criminals" stigmatized entire generations, with effects persisting even after the Act's repeal in 1949.
| Aspect | Details | Estimated Population Affected |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Criminal Tribes Declared | 127 Communities across British India | ~13 million people |
| Forced Settlements Established | Multiple locations, children often separated | Unknown exact numbers |
| Surveillance Requirements | Weekly police reporting by adult males | Millions of men annually |
| Long-term Consequences | Stigma persisted post-repeal (1949) | Communities remain affected |
3. The Government of India Act 1935: A Double-Edged Reform
3.1 First Legal Recognition of Scheduled Castes
The Government of India Act 1935 marked a significant milestone as the first legislation to formally use the term "Scheduled Castes". The subsequent Government of India (Scheduled Castes) Order of 1936 provided detailed lists of communities recognized as Scheduled Castes across different provinces. This order stated:
"the castes, races or tribes or parts of or groups within castes, races or tribes specified in Parts I to IX of the Schedule to this Order shall, in the Provinces to which those Parts respectively relate, be deemed to be scheduled castes".
3.2 Exclusions and Limitations
However, the 1936 Order also contained significant exclusions that revealed the contradictory nature of British policy:
- Religious Restrictions: "No Indian Christian shall be deemed to a member of a Scheduled Caste"
- Regional Variations: In Bengal, Buddhists and tribal religion followers were excluded from Scheduled Caste status
- Administrative Control: The classification remained entirely under British administrative control, with affected communities having no say in their designation
| Aspect | Description | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Legislation | Government of India Act 1935 & Scheduled Castes Order 1936 | First formal legal recognition |
| Communities Included | 400+ communities across provinces | Varied by region |
| Communities Excluded | Indian Christians, Buddhists in Bengal, others | Based on religious and regional lines |
| Control | Classifications made by British administrators | No community participation |
4. Impact on Marginalized Communities
The enforcement of the Criminal Tribes Act and other colonial policies had devastating effects on the marginalized castes and tribes. Apart from stigmatization as hereditary criminals, affected communities faced forced displacement, restricted economic opportunities, and constant surveillance. These policies isolated tribal and lower-caste groups from mainstream society, causing long-term social and economic harm.
One major consequence was the displacement of tribal communities from their traditional lands. The British promoted agriculture and settlement in tribal areas, often acquiring tribal lands for non-tribal use. This led to the uprooting of many tribal groups, disrupting their traditional way of life, social fabric, and cultural identity. Forced resettlement in remote, underdeveloped regions perpetuated poverty and deprivation among these communities.
| Impact | Description |
|---|---|
| Displacement | Forced removal of tribal communities from ancestral lands for agricultural expansion |
| Isolation | Resettlement in remote areas devoid of basic amenities, leading to social and economic marginalization |
| Economic Erosion | Traditional tribal economies undermined by imposition of unsuitable agricultural practices |
| Cultural Disruption | Loss of traditional social structures and cultural identity due to displacement and forced assimilation |
5. The Government of India Act 1935: A Double-Edged Reform
The Government of India Act 1935 was a landmark legislation by the British colonial government. It was the first law to use the term "Scheduled Castes" formally and provided for the legal recognition of these communities across provinces. This act laid the foundation for reserved seats in legislatures and other protective measures for marginalized groups.
However, the act contained significant contradictions. While it recognized Scheduled Castes legally, the classification was entirely under British administrative control, excluding input from the communities themselves. Certain religious groups, like Indian Christians and Buddhists in some regions such as Bengal, were deliberately excluded from Scheduled Caste status.
5.1 Provisions and Recognition
- Detailed lists of Scheduled Castes were included in the Government of India (Scheduled Castes) Order of 1936.
- Reserved seats in provincial legislatures were allocated to these communities, formalizing political participation.
- Recognition was limited by religious and regional exclusions.
5.2 Exclusions and Administrative Control
- No Indian Christians were included as Scheduled Castes despite many facing caste discrimination.
- Buddhists and followers of tribal religions in Bengal were excluded.
- British administrators made all classification decisions without community consultation, reflecting colonial control rather than reform.
| Feature | Description |
|---|---|
| Legal Recognition | First formal use of "Scheduled Castes" and lists in legislation |
| Political Representation | Reserved seats in provincial legislatures for Scheduled Castes |
| Religious Exclusions | Indian Christians and some Buddhists excluded from Scheduled Caste status |
| Administrative Control | Classifications decided solely by British officials without community input |
6. Exclusions and Limitations
Although the Government of India Act 1935 made important strides in acknowledging Scheduled Castes, the exclusions significantly limited its impact. The policy to exclude Indian Christians from Scheduled Caste status was rooted in religious biases, ignoring that caste-based discrimination persisted against converts. Similar regional exclusions further fragmented marginalized identities.
Moreover, the Act included provisions about electoral rolls, voter qualifications, and constituency definitions that imposed additional controls restricting broad political participation. These restrictions ensured that marginalized groups, while granted some representation, remained subject to colonial oversight and control.
The cumulative effect of these exclusions and controls was a reinforcement of social divisions and limited empowerment of marginalized communities under colonial rule.
| Limitation | Details |
|---|---|
| Religious Exclusions | Indian Christians and some Buddhists excluded despite caste discrimination |
| Restricted Political Participation | Voter qualifications and electoral roll restrictions limited full participation |
| Colonial Control | Decisions about classifications and representation made by British authorities only |
| Fragmented Identity | Regional variations in recognition and exclusions led to fractured caste identities |
7. The Census Conundrum: How British Classification Rigidified Caste
The British conducted regular censuses in India, and from 1872 onwards, caste became a major category. Under the leadership of Herbert Risley in the 1901 census, caste classification adopted anthropometric and racial theories. This approach was supposed to be scientific but in practice reinforced stereotypes and created rigid caste divisions where fluidity formerly existed.
Risley compared caste differences to physical characteristics like skull measurements and nose length, linking caste to race. This pseudo-scientific method gave official authority to social hierarchies.
| Year | Key Feature | Impact |
|---|---|---|
| 1872 | First nationwide census | Started documenting caste by occupation and region |
| 1901 | Risley introduces anthropometry | Linked caste to racial theories |
| 1931 | Detailed caste lists | Standardized caste names; reduced fluidity between castes |
8. Problems with Census Classification
The British never maintained a uniform definition of caste, race, or tribe throughout their census operations (1872–1941). As a result, classification varied from province to province. The same community might be labelled as a tribe in one area and a caste in another.
- No uniform definition: Categories differed each census year.
- Elite bias: Relied on upper-caste informants and Brahmanical interpretations.
- Data inconsistency: Names and ranks of communities frequently changed.
- Administrative confusion: Overlaps between caste and occupational identity.
| Problem Type | Description |
|---|---|
| Definition Issues | Varied definitions for 'caste' and 'tribe' |
| Elite Input Bias | Dominated by upper-caste narratives |
| Inconsistency | Caste names/ranks changed between censuses |
| Overlap | Communities categorized differently across provinces |
9. The Creation of New Caste Identities
Colonial enumerations sometimes invented caste identities that did not exist before. For example, terms like "Chandala" in Bengal, formerly a general term for untouchables, became a fixed caste name in census records. Communities petitioned for higher caste status, creating new caste associations and altering their names to improve their social position.
By 1931, there was so much fluctuation that Census Commissioner J.H. Hutton remarked on how some communities changed their claimed status from one upper caste to another within a decade to improve rank.
| Caste Name | Origin | Reason for Creation |
|---|---|---|
| Yadav | Grouped dairy farmers & cowherds | Broader political recognition & unity |
| Vishwakarma | Grouped artisans across regions | Professional identity and religious significance |
| Chandala | Generic low-caste label in Bengal | Formalized in census; gained official caste status |
10. The Communal Award and Poona Pact: Political Maneuvering or Genuine Reform?
In 1932, the British Prime Minister Ramsay MacDonald announced the Communal Award, introducing separate electorates for the "Depressed Classes." This meant these communities would elect their own representatives — separate from Hindus and Muslims — much like Muslims had separate electorates.
Dr. B.R. Ambedkar initially supported it, as it gave Dalits political autonomy. However, Gandhi opposed separate electorates for untouchables, fearing it would permanently divide Hindu society. This led to the Poona Pact of 1932, a compromise that:
- Replaced separate electorates with reserved seats within joint electorates
- Increased reserved seats for depressed classes in provincial legislatures from 71 to 148
- Secured 18% reserved seats in the central legislature
- Promised educational grants for Dalit upliftment
| Aspect | Communal Award (1932) | Poona Pact (1932) |
|---|---|---|
| Representation | 71 seats in provincial legislatures | 148 seats in provincial legislatures |
| Electorate Type | Separate electorates for Depressed Classes | Joint electorates with reserved seats |
| Central Legislature Seats | Not specified | 18% reserved seats |
| Educational Support | Not mentioned | Scholarships & grants for Depressed Classes |
11. The Creation of New Caste Identities
Colonial enumerations sometimes invented caste identities that did not exist before. For example, terms like "Chandala" in Bengal, formerly a general term for untouchables, became a fixed caste name in census records. Communities petitioned for higher caste status, creating new caste associations and altering their names to improve their social position.
By 1931, there was so much fluctuation that Census Commissioner J.H. Hutton remarked on how some communities changed their claimed status from one upper caste to another within a decade to improve rank.
| Caste Name | Origin | Reason for Creation |
|---|---|---|
| Yadav | Grouped dairy farmers & cowherds | Broader political recognition & unity |
| Vishwakarma | Grouped artisans across regions | Professional identity and religious significance |
| Chandala | Generic low-caste label in Bengal | Formalized in census; gained official caste status |
12. The Communal Award and Poona Pact: Political Maneuvering or Genuine Reform?
In 1932, the British Prime Minister Ramsay MacDonald announced the Communal Award, introducing separate electorates for the "Depressed Classes." This meant these communities would elect their own representatives—separate from Hindus and Muslims—much like Muslims had separate electorates.
Dr. B.R. Ambedkar initially supported it, as it gave Dalits political autonomy. However, Gandhi opposed separate electorates for untouchables, fearing it would permanently divide Hindu society. This led to the Poona Pact of 1932, a compromise that:
- Replaced separate electorates with reserved seats within joint electorates
- Increased reserved seats for depressed classes in provincial legislatures from 71 to 148
- Secured 18% reserved seats in the central legislature
- Promised educational grants for Dalit upliftment
| Aspect | Communal Award (1932) | Poona Pact (1932) |
|---|---|---|
| Representation | 71 seats in provincial legislatures | 148 seats in provincial legislatures |
| Electorate Type | Separate electorates for Depressed Classes | Joint electorates with reserved seats |
| Central Legislature Seats | Not specified | 18% reserved seats |
| Educational Support | Not mentioned | Scholarships & grants for Depressed Classes |
13. Educational Policies: Limited Access or Systematic Exclusion?
The British government made some declarations for educational access to marginalized communities. In 1858, after an incident where an untouchable boy was denied admission to a government school in Dharwar, the authorities declared that government educational institutions would be open to all classes.
Despite this, in practice, educational access remained severely limited for Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes, and other marginalized groups. Admission refusals, especially in rural areas, were common. Often, education was separate or segregated, maintaining social distinctions.
Christian missionaries played a significant role by establishing schools specifically for untouchables, providing free education, meals, and clothing. Their efforts contrasted with Hindu caste norms, offering an alternative path to social mobility.
| Community | Estimated Access to Education |
|---|---|
| Scheduled Castes | Approximately 5% |
| Scheduled Tribes | Approximately 2% |
| Criminal Tribes | Approximately 1% |
| General Population | Approximately 12% |
14. Missionary Contributions
Christian missionaries had a considerable impact on marginalized communities, especially in regions like Tamil Nadu. They provided free education, medical care, and basic necessities, challenging the oppressive caste hierarchy.
Conversions to Christianity were sometimes seen as escapes from caste-based discrimination, offering dignity and social inclusion. Missionary schools were often the only option for untouchable children to attain education in a supportive environment.
However, missionary work also faced criticism for cultural imperialism and limited reach. Nonetheless, their contribution to social upliftment and education of marginalized communities remains significant.
| Service | Description |
|---|---|
| Education | Free schools with meals and clothing, focused on untouchables |
| Healthcare | Medical services often not provided by other institutions |
| Social Inclusion | Alternative social framework rejecting caste hierarchy |
| Conversion | Many untouchables converted seeking dignity and equality |
15. The Contradictory Nature of British Social Reform
While the British colonial government implemented some social reforms aimed at marginalized communities, these were often conflicting and limited in scope. The 1858 Queen Victoria's Proclamation promised religious neutrality and equal treatment under law. However, this was contradicted by selective support for Christian missionary activity and a general reluctance to interfere deeply in entrenched caste practices.
The proclaimed religious neutrality often served colonial administrative convenience more than genuine social progress, allowing for missionary influence while controlling other religious and social reforms.
16. The Limits of Religious Neutrality
The proclaimed neutrality of the colonial government excluded meaningful intervention in caste-based discrimination. Christian missionary activities continued with implicit government support, challenging social norms, but Hindu caste practices were largely left unaltered except where they conflicted with colonial interests.
This created a selective and uneven approach to religion and social reform, privileging Christian interests while maintaining caste divisions that supported British rule.
17. Dr. B.R. Ambedkar and the Simon Commission: A Case Study in Colonial Engagement
Dr. Bhimrao Ramji Ambedkar, representing marginalized communities, strategically engaged with the Simon Commission (1927–1930), unlike many Indian leaders who boycotted it. He presented detailed evidence of caste oppression and demanded safeguards, including:
- Separate electorates for Depressed Classes
- Educational facilities and scholarships
- Constitutional protections against discrimination
- Economic rights and property ownership
Though the Simon Commission acknowledged some issues, its recommendations were limited and reflected colonial interests more than comprehensive reforms.
18. The Colonial Legacy: Long-term Impact on Marginalized Communities
The legacies of British colonial policies on caste remain deeply embedded in India’s social and political fabric. Colonial classifications and administrative frameworks laid the groundwork for post-independence reservation policies but also entrenched caste identities and divisions.
The Habitual Offenders Act of 1952, following repeal of the Criminal Tribes Act, continued discriminatory practices against "denotified tribes," illustrating the persistence of colonial-era stigma and systemic inequality.
19. Statistical Evidence: The Real Impact of British Policies
Statistical data sheds light on the scale and effects of colonial policies:
| Category | Estimated Population | Number of Communities |
|---|---|---|
| Scheduled Castes (1936) | Approximately 60 million | 400+ communities |
| Criminal Tribes | Approximately 13 million | 127 communities |
| Scheduled Tribes | Approximately 25 million | 500+ communities |
| Community | Education Access Estimate |
|---|---|
| Scheduled Castes | About 5% |
| Scheduled Tribes | About 2% |
| Criminal Tribes | About 1% |
| General Population | About 12% |
| Aspect | Description | Significance |
|---|---|---|
| Reserved Provincial Seats | 148 seats for Scheduled Castes | Enhanced political participation |
| Reserved Central Legislature Seats | 18% reserved for Scheduled Castes | Recognition at national level |
| Legal Framework | Formal political participation rights | Foundation for future democratic inclusion |
20. The Missionary Factor: Christianity as Social Liberation?
Christian missionaries provided marginalized communities, especially Dalits, with an alternative social framework that rejected caste hierarchy. Many Dalits converted to Christianity, seeking dignity, education, and social inclusion they were denied in Hindu society. Particularly during events like the famine of 1876-1879, conversions increased as Christianity offered tangible relief and social support.
Missionaries established schools, provided healthcare, and offered economic training as part of their social services. However, missionary work also faced criticism for promoting cultural imperialism and reaching only a small segment of marginalized communities.
| Service | Description |
|---|---|
| Education | Free schools for untouchable children with meals and clothing |
| Healthcare | Medical services often denied by other institutions |
| Social Inclusion | Alternative framework rejecting caste discrimination |
| Conversion | Many Dalits converted seeking equality and dignity |
21. Economic Policies: Land Rights and Caste
British colonial economic policies reinforced caste-based discrimination through legislation that restricted land ownership and economic mobility for lower castes. Laws such as the Land Alienation Act of 1900 and the Punjab Pre-Emption Act of 1913 prevented marginalized communities from owning or transferring property freely, perpetuating economic disparities.
While some industrial employment opportunities opened irrespective of caste, most marginalized communities remained excluded from better-paying jobs and faced discrimination in the workplace.
| Policy | Description | Impact on Lower Castes |
|---|---|---|
| Land Alienation Act 1900 | Restricted land sales from upper to lower castes | Prevented economic mobility via land ownership |
| Punjab Pre-Emption Act 1913 | Prevented land transfer across caste lines | Enforced segregation in property ownership |
| Industrial Employment | Job opportunities grew but mostly excluded marginalized castes | Discrimination persisted despite some openings |
22. The Census Wars: Identity Politics in Colonial India
Colonial census operations ignited identity politics as communities petitioned for higher social status and recognition. Caste associations formed to lobby for improved classification or reclassification, often changing caste names and histories for political advantage.
The census also created new caste groupings by aggregating communities with similar occupations, fostering new identities like "Yadav" and "Vishwakarma." These politically motivated identity struggles reshaped caste dynamics and intensified social divisions.
| Activity | Effect |
|---|---|
| Petitions for Higher Status | Communities sought to elevate caste rank for social and political advantage |
| Caste Associations | Formed to represent interests and lobby colonial authorities |
| Identity Changes | Renaming and unifying caste groups for greater recognition |
| New Castes Created | "Yadav" and "Vishwakarma" as examples of census-created identities |
23. Women and Caste: The Intersection of Gender and Colonial Policy
British colonial policies barely addressed the specific challenges faced by women from marginalized communities. These women suffered from both caste-based and gender-based discrimination, with even more limited access to education and economic opportunities.
Christian missionaries made some effort to educate marginalized girls, establishing girls' schools and boarding facilities that broke traditional caste and gender barriers. However, these initiatives reached only a small fraction of women in need.
| Issue | Description | Missionary Efforts |
|---|---|---|
| Double Discrimination | Women faced both caste and gender marginalization | N/A |
| Educational Exclusion | Limited access to schools and literacy | Girls' schools and boarding facilities established |
| Economic Dependence | Lack of independent job opportunities | Some vocational training by missionaries |
| Social Mobility Barriers | Entrenched caste and gender norms restrict progress | Missionary challenge to traditional roles |
24. Women and Caste: The Intersection of Gender and Colonial Policy
British colonial policies regarding caste often neglected the specific challenges faced by women from marginalized communities. These women experienced double discrimination—both caste-based and gender-based—which severely limited their opportunities for education and economic independence.
Educational opportunities for women from Scheduled Castes and other marginalized groups were even more restricted than for men. Social and economic dependence was widespread, reinforcing cycles of poverty and exclusion.
Christian missionaries played a crucial role in addressing these gaps by establishing girls' schools and boarding facilities. These institutions challenged traditional caste and gender restrictions, providing some marginalized girls a pathway to education and social mobility.
| Issue | Description | Missionary Intervention |
|---|---|---|
| Double Discrimination | Women faced both caste and gender marginalization | N/A |
| Educational Access | Severely limited schooling opportunities | Girls' schools and boarding facilities established |
| Economic Dependence | Lack of independent employment and vocational training | Some vocational training by missionaries |
| Social Mobility | Entrenched patriarchal and caste norms restricted progress | Missionaries challenged traditional gender roles |
25. The Regional Variations: Different Experiences Across India
The impact of British colonial policies on caste and marginalized communities varied significantly across regions. Differences in local social dynamics, religious composition, and colonial administrative priorities led to diverse experiences in Tamil Nadu, Bengal, and Punjab.
- Tamil Nadu: Strong missionary presence and the rise of anti-Brahmin movements created relatively greater educational opportunities and political mobilization among marginalized castes.
- Bengal: Complex caste classifications and frequent changes characterized colonial administration, with urban-rural divides influencing social interactions and early political organization among scheduled castes.
- Punjab: Emphasis on agricultural land rights and Sikh religious identities shaped caste dynamics, with a relatively smaller scheduled caste population compared to other regions.
| Region | Key Features | Impact on Marginalized Communities |
|---|---|---|
| Tamil Nadu | Strong missionary activity, anti-Brahmin politics | Better educational access, political mobilization |
| Bengal | Complex caste classifications, urban-rural divide | Frequent census changes, early political organization |
| Punjab | Focus on agricultural land rights, Sikh influence | Smaller scheduled caste population, land-centric issues |
References
- CIS Indus. "Divide and Rule: The British Colonial Policy on Caste." 1995.
- Wikipedia. "Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes." 2005.
- Wikipedia. "Caste system in India." 2004.
- Journal Article. "The caste system in India during British Raj: (1872-1941)."
- Testbook. "Which legislation for the first time used the term 'Scheduled Castes'." 2025.
- GARPH. "Socio-political changes for depressed classes in colonial India." 2012.
- University Research. "Abolition of untouchability and upliftment of the untouchables."
- SSRN. "The Criminal Tribes Act of 1871 and its Global Legacy." 2025.
- Drishti CUET. "Communal Award and Poona Pact 1932." 2024.
- Vajira Mandravi. "Poona Pact 1932, Features, Significance, History." 2025.
- Garuda Life. "The Criminal Tribes Act 1871: The Devious Law." 2025.
- Wikipedia. "Criminal Tribes Act." 2009.
- History Journal. "The case of Dalits in colonial Tamil Nadu."
- Stop Hindu Dvesha. "Caste, Colonialism, and Risley's Lasting Impact." 2024.
- Cambridge Core. "The Queen's Urdu: Translating Colonial Secularity." 2024.
- Wikipedia. "Census in British India." 2014.
- Government Document. "Scheduled Castes Orders Issued at Different Times." 1936.
- Testbook. "Simon Commission statements about Simon Commission." 2022.
- NUJS Law Review. "Caste and Community Movement in the 21st Century." 2023.
- Velivada. "Dr Babasaheb Ambedkar and Simon Commission." 2019.